Chevrolet Kalos 2005 vs Renault Clio 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.1 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 71 HP | 60 HP | |
| Torque: | 104 NM | 93 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.7 seconds | 15 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Kalos is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Kalos engine produces 11 HP more power than Renault Clio, whereas torque is 11 NM more than Renault Clio. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Kalos reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Clio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chevrolet Kalos consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Kalos could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Kalos consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 620 km with real consumption | 790 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 3.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Chevrolet Kalos is larger. Chevrolet Kalos is 7 cm longer than the Renault Clio, 3 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Kalos is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 255 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1035 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Kalos is 0.5 metres less than that of the Renault Clio, which means Chevrolet Kalos can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`100 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Renault Clio has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Kalos has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Renault Clio, so Renault Clio quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Kalos has
|
Renault Clio has
| |