Chevrolet Kalos 2005 vs Mazda 2 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.1 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 71 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 104 NM | 110 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.7 seconds | 15.1 seconds | |
| Chevrolet Kalos engine produces 4 HP less power than Mazda 2, whereas torque is 6 NM less than Mazda 2. Despite less power, Chevrolet Kalos reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 6.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
| By specification Chevrolet Kalos consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Kalos could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 810 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| 620 km with real consumption | 620 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 3.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.54 m | |
|
Chevrolet Kalos is smaller. Chevrolet Kalos is 4 cm shorter than the Mazda 2, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Kalos is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 267 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1044 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`100 | 1`490 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | high | |
| Mazda 2 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Kalos has serious deffects in 135 percent more cases than Mazda 2, so Mazda 2 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Kalos has
|
Mazda 2 has
| |