Chevrolet Kalos 2005 vs Honda Jazz 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.1 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 71 HP | 78 HP | |
| Torque: | 104 NM | 110 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.7 seconds | 13.7 seconds | |
| Chevrolet Kalos engine produces 7 HP less power than Honda Jazz, whereas torque is 6 NM less than Honda Jazz. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 6.1 l/100km | |
|
The Honda Jazz is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chevrolet Kalos consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Jazz, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Kalos could require 165 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Kalos consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Jazz. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 810 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| 620 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
| Honda Jazz gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 3.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.52 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chevrolet Kalos is 4 cm longer than the Honda Jazz, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Kalos is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 380 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1323 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Kalos is 0.4 metres more than that of the Honda Jazz, which means Chevrolet Kalos can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`100 | 1`455 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | high | |
| Honda Jazz has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Kalos has serious deffects in 85 percent more cases than Honda Jazz, so Honda Jazz quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Honda Jazz has
| |