Chevrolet Kalos 2005 vs Skoda Fabia 2004
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 83 HP | 115 HP | |
Torque: | 123 NM | 170 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
Skoda Fabia is a more dynamic driving. Chevrolet Kalos engine produces 32 HP less power than Skoda Fabia, whereas torque is 47 NM less than Skoda Fabia. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Kalos reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 7.7 | |
Chevrolet Kalos consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Kalos over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
750 km on highway | 760 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.88 m | 4.22 m | |
Width: | 1.67 m | 1.65 m | |
Height: | 1.50 m | 1.45 m | |
Chevrolet Kalos is 34 cm shorter than the Skoda Fabia, 2 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Kalos is 5 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 438 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 789 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the Chevrolet Kalos is 0.7 metres less than that of the Skoda Fabia, which means Chevrolet Kalos can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`100 | 1`655 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | low | average | |
Skoda Fabia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Kalos has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 1200 | 1200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Kalos has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |