Chevrolet Kalos 2005 vs Seat Cordoba 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 83 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 123 NM | 126 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 13.6 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Kalos is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Kalos engine produces 8 HP more power than Seat Cordoba, but torque is 3 NM less than Seat Cordoba. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Kalos reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 6.4 | |
|
The Seat Cordoba is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Kalos consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Cordoba, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Kalos could require 165 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| Seat Cordoba gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Chevrolet Kalos is smaller, but higher. Chevrolet Kalos is 40 cm shorter than the Seat Cordoba, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Kalos is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Kalos is 0.8 metres less than that of the Seat Cordoba, which means Chevrolet Kalos can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`100 | 800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Kalos has
|
Seat Cordoba has
| |