Chevrolet Kalos 2005 vs Fiat Stilo 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 83 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 123 NM | 128 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 12.4 seconds | |
| Chevrolet Kalos engine produces 12 HP less power than Fiat Stilo, whereas torque is 5 NM less than Fiat Stilo. Despite less power, Chevrolet Kalos reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 6.7 | |
|
The Fiat Stilo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Kalos consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Stilo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Kalos could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| Fiat Stilo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Chevrolet Kalos is smaller, but slightly higher. Chevrolet Kalos is 37 cm shorter than the Fiat Stilo, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Kalos is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 370 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Kalos is 0.7 metres less than that of the Fiat Stilo, which means Chevrolet Kalos can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`100 | 1`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | Fiat Stilo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Kalos has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Fiat Stilo, so Fiat Stilo quality is probably better | ||
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Kalos has
|
Fiat Stilo has
| |