Chevrolet Kalos 2005 vs Ford Fiesta 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.1 - 1.4 (petrol) | 1.3 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 71 - 94 HP | 68 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 104 - 130 NM | 106 - 204 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 - 13.7 seconds | 8.4 - 17.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 - 7.6 | 4.3 - 7.4 | |
|
Chevrolet Kalos petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford Fiesta. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 3.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Chevrolet Kalos is smaller, but slightly higher. Chevrolet Kalos is 4 cm shorter than the Ford Fiesta, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Kalos is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 175 litres | 284 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 947 litres | |
|
Ford Fiesta has more luggage space. Chevrolet Kalos has 109 litres less trunk space than the Ford Fiesta. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Kalos is 1.6 metres less than that of the Ford Fiesta, which means Chevrolet Kalos can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`100 | ~ 1`562 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Kalos has
|
Ford Fiesta has
| |