Chevrolet Kalos 2005 vs Renault Modus 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Hatchback | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.1 - 1.4 (petrol) | 1.1 - 1.6 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 71 - 94 HP | 65 - 113 HP | |
| Torque: | 104 - 130 NM | 105 - 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 - 13.7 seconds | 10 - 15 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 - 7.6 | 4.5 - 7.5 | |
|
Chevrolet Kalos petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Renault Modus. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 3.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.59 m | |
| Chevrolet Kalos is 9 cm longer than the Renault Modus, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Kalos is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 175 litres | 274 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1283 litres | |
|
Renault Modus has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Chevrolet Kalos has 99 litres less trunk space than the Renault Modus. This could mean that the Chevrolet Kalos uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Kalos is 1.1 metres less than that of the Renault Modus, which means Chevrolet Kalos can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`100 | ~ 1`653 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Kalos has
|
Renault Modus has
| |