Chevrolet Kalos 2005 vs Renault Clio 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.1 - 1.4 (petrol) | 1.2 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 71 - 94 HP | 60 - 197 HP | |
| Torque: | 104 - 130 NM | 93 - 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 - 13.7 seconds | 6.9 - 15.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 - 7.6 | 4.3 - 8.4 | |
|
Chevrolet Kalos petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Renault Clio. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 3.94 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.47 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chevrolet Kalos is 6 cm shorter than the Renault Clio, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Kalos is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 175 litres | 288 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1038 litres | |
|
Renault Clio has more luggage space. Chevrolet Kalos has 113 litres less trunk space than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Kalos is 1.5 metres less than that of the Renault Clio, which means Chevrolet Kalos can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`100 | ~ 1`653 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Kalos has
|
Renault Clio has
| |