Chevrolet Kalos 2005 vs Mitsubishi Colt 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.1 - 1.4 (petrol) | 1.1 - 1.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 71 - 94 HP | 68 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 104 - 130 NM | 100 - 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 - 13.7 seconds | 8 - 14.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 - 7.6 | 4.8 - 6.8 | |
|
Chevrolet Kalos petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Colt. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 3.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.52 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chevrolet Kalos is 7 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Colt, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Kalos is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 175 litres | 220 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 760 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Chevrolet Kalos has 45 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Colt. This could mean that the Chevrolet Kalos uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Kalos is 1 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Colt, which means Chevrolet Kalos can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`100 | ~ 1`482 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Kalos has
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |