Chevrolet Kalos 2005 vs Mazda 2 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.1 - 1.4 (petrol) | 1.2 - 1.6 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 71 - 94 HP | 68 - 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 104 - 130 NM | 110 - 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 - 13.7 seconds | 11.4 - 16 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 - 7.6 | 4.5 - 7.1 | |
|
Chevrolet Kalos petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 2. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 3.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.54 m | |
|
Chevrolet Kalos is smaller. Chevrolet Kalos is 4 cm shorter than the Mazda 2, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Kalos is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 175 litres | 267 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1044 litres | |
|
Mazda 2 has more luggage space. Chevrolet Kalos has 92 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 2. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`100 | ~ 1`512 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Kalos has
|
Mazda 2 has
| |