Chevrolet Kalos 2005 vs Honda Jazz 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.1 - 1.4 | 1.2 - 1.3 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 71 - 94 HP | 78 - 83 HP | |
| Torque: | 104 - 130 NM | 110 - 119 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 - 13.7 seconds | 12.9 - 14.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 - 7.6 | 5.5 - 5.8 | |
|
Chevrolet Kalos petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda Jazz. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 3.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.52 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chevrolet Kalos is 4 cm longer than the Honda Jazz, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Kalos is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 175 litres | 380 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1323 litres | |
|
Honda Jazz has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Chevrolet Kalos has 205 litres less trunk space than the Honda Jazz. This could mean that the Chevrolet Kalos uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`100 | ~ 1`465 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Honda Jazz has
| |