Chevrolet Kalos 2005 vs Kia RIO 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 | 1.3 - 1.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 83 - 94 HP | 82 - 108 HP | |
| Torque: | 123 - 130 NM | 116 - 140 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 - 12.1 seconds | 11.6 - 14.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 - 7.6 | 6.7 - 8.3 | |
|
On average, the Chevrolet Kalos petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Kia RIO. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.00 m | 4.23 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Chevrolet Kalos is smaller, but higher. Chevrolet Kalos is 23 cm shorter than the Kia RIO, width is practically the same , while the height of Chevrolet Kalos is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 375 litres | 326 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Kalos has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Kia RIO may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Kalos is 0.3 metres more than that of the Kia RIO. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`100 kg | ~ 1`493 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Kalos has
|
Kia RIO has
| |