Chevrolet Kalos 2005 vs Opel Corsa 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.1 - 1.4 (petrol) | 1.0 - 1.8 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 71 - 94 HP | 60 - 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 104 - 130 NM | 88 - 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 - 13.7 seconds | 9 - 18 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 - 7.6 | 4.4 - 7.9 | |
|
Chevrolet Kalos petrol engines consumes on average 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Opel Corsa. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 3.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Chevrolet Kalos is larger. Chevrolet Kalos is 4 cm longer than the Opel Corsa, 2 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Kalos is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 175 litres | 260 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1060 litres | |
|
Opel Corsa has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Chevrolet Kalos has 85 litres less trunk space than the Opel Corsa. This could mean that the Chevrolet Kalos uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Kalos is 0.2 metres less than that of the Opel Corsa. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`100 | ~ 1`471 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Kalos has
|
Opel Corsa has
| |