Chevrolet Kalos 2005 vs Fiat Stilo 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chevrolet Kalos is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Fiat Stilo is available only with manual gearbox. | |||
| Engines: | 1.1 - 1.4 (petrol) | 1.4 - 1.9 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 71 - 94 HP | 95 - 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 104 - 130 NM | 128 - 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 - 13.7 seconds | 10.9 - 12.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 - 7.6 | 5.4 - 7.0 | |
|
Chevrolet Kalos petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Fiat Stilo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Chevrolet Kalos is smaller, but slightly higher. Chevrolet Kalos is 37 cm shorter than the Fiat Stilo, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Kalos is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 175 litres | 370 litres | |
|
Fiat Stilo has more luggage space. Chevrolet Kalos has 195 litres less trunk space than the Fiat Stilo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Kalos is 0.7 metres less than that of the Fiat Stilo, which means Chevrolet Kalos can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`100 | ~ 1`133 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Kalos has
|
Fiat Stilo has
| |