Chevrolet Kalos 2005 vs Fiat Punto 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.1 - 1.4 (petrol) | 1.2 - 1.9 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 71 - 94 HP | 60 - 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 104 - 130 NM | 102 - 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 - 13.7 seconds | 9.6 - 14.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 - 7.6 | 4.5 - 6.5 | |
|
Chevrolet Kalos petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Fiat Punto. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 3.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chevrolet Kalos is 2 cm longer than the Fiat Punto, 1 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Kalos is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 175 litres | 297 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1080 litres | |
|
Fiat Punto has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Chevrolet Kalos has 122 litres less trunk space than the Fiat Punto. This could mean that the Chevrolet Kalos uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Kalos is 0.7 metres less than that of the Fiat Punto, which means Chevrolet Kalos can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`100 | ~ 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Kalos has
|
Fiat Punto has
| |