Chevrolet Impala 2013 vs Chrysler 200 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.6 Petrol | 3.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 309 HP | 294 HP | |
| Torque: | 358 NM | 355 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Chevrolet Impala engine produces 15 HP more power than Chrysler 200, whereas torque is 3 NM more than Chrysler 200. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.7 | 10.2 | |
| Chevrolet Impala consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler 200, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Impala could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
| Chevrolet Impala gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 460'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Chrysler 200 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Chevrolet Camaro, Chevrolet Equinox | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Chrysler Grand Voyager, Chrysler Town & Country | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chrysler 200 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Chrysler 200 2015 3.6 engine: The variable valve timing regulators, oil pump, water pump, and thermostat are known for their limited lifespan. Another common issue is the clogging of oil channels with wear particles.
After ... More about Chrysler 200 2015 3.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.11 m | 4.89 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.49 m | |
| Chevrolet Impala is 23 cm longer than the Chrysler 200, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 532 litres | 453 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Impala has more luggage capacity. Chevrolet Impala has 79 litres more trunk space than the Chrysler 200. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 12.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Impala is 0.3 metres less than that of the Chrysler 200. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`092 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 10 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Impala has
|
Chrysler 200 has
| |