Chevrolet Impala 2004 vs Hyundai Equus 1999
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.8 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 245 HP | 210 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 314 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Chevrolet Impala engine produces 35 HP more power than Hyundai Equus, whereas torque is 66 NM more than Hyundai Equus. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.2 | 12.5 | |
|
The Chevrolet Impala is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Impala consumes 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Equus, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Impala over 15,000 km in a year you can save 345 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| 770 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 5.07 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.49 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chevrolet Impala is 2 cm longer than the Hyundai Equus, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Impala is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 454 litres | 505 litres | |
|
Hyundai Equus has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Chevrolet Impala has 51 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai Equus. This could mean that the Chevrolet Impala uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`265 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Impala has
|
Hyundai Equus has
| |