Chevrolet Impala 2004 vs Chrysler Concorde 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.8 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 245 HP | 237 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 339 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7 seconds | 8 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Impala is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Impala engine produces 8 HP more power than Chrysler Concorde, whereas torque is 41 NM more than Chrysler Concorde. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Impala reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.2 | 10.8 | |
|
The Chevrolet Impala is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Impala consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Concorde, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Impala over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 770 km on highway | 760 km on highway | ||
| Chevrolet Impala gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 5.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Chevrolet Impala is smaller, but slightly higher. Chevrolet Impala is 20 cm shorter than the Chrysler Concorde, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Impala is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 454 litres | 530 litres | |
|
Chrysler Concorde has more luggage space. Chevrolet Impala has 76 litres less trunk space than the Chrysler Concorde. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight: | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Impala has
|
Chrysler Concorde has
| |