Chevrolet Impala 2004 vs Chrysler 300M 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.8 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 245 HP | 254 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7 seconds | 8.8 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Impala is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Impala engine produces 9 HP less power than Chrysler 300M, but torque is 40 NM more than Chrysler 300M. Despite less power, Chevrolet Impala reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.2 | 10.7 | |
| Chevrolet Impala consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler 300M, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Impala over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 770 km on highway | 750 km on highway | ||
| Chevrolet Impala gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 5.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.42 m | |
| Chevrolet Impala is 8 cm longer than the Chrysler 300M, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Impala is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 454 litres | 530 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 530 litres | |
|
Chrysler 300M has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Chevrolet Impala has 76 litres less trunk space than the Chrysler 300M. This could mean that the Chevrolet Impala uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`120 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Impala has
|
Chrysler 300M has
| |