Chevrolet Impala 2000 vs Hyundai Equus 1999
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.8 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 204 HP | 210 HP | |
| Torque: | 305 NM | 314 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Chevrolet Impala engine produces 6 HP less power than Hyundai Equus, whereas torque is 9 NM less than Hyundai Equus. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.8 | 12.5 | |
|
The Chevrolet Impala is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Impala consumes 2.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Equus, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Impala over 15,000 km in a year you can save 405 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 5.07 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.49 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chevrolet Impala is 2 cm longer than the Hyundai Equus, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Impala is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 525 litres | 505 litres | |
| Chevrolet Impala has 20 litres more trunk space than the Hyundai Equus. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`265 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Impala has
|
| |