Chevrolet Impala 2000 vs Chrysler 300M 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.8 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 204 HP | 254 HP | |
| Torque: | 305 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 8.8 seconds | |
| Chevrolet Impala engine produces 50 HP less power than Chrysler 300M, whereas torque is 35 NM less than Chrysler 300M. Despite less power, Chevrolet Impala reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.8 | 10.7 | |
|
The Chevrolet Impala is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Impala consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler 300M, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Impala over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 750 km on highway | ||
| Chevrolet Impala gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 5.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.42 m | |
| Chevrolet Impala is 8 cm longer than the Chrysler 300M, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Impala is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 525 litres | 530 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 530 litres | |
| Chevrolet Impala has 5 litres less trunk space than the Chrysler 300M. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`120 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Impala has
|
Chrysler 300M has
| |