Chevrolet Impala 2000 vs Volvo S80 1999
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.4 Petrol | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 278 NM | 290 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Impala is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Impala engine produces 37 HP more power than Volvo S80, but torque is 12 NM less than Volvo S80. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Impala reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 | 6.4 | |
|
The Volvo S80 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Impala consumes 2.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S80, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Impala could require 420 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 1250 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 1630 km on highway | ||
| Volvo S80 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Chevrolet Impala is larger. Chevrolet Impala is 26 cm longer than the Volvo S80, 3 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Impala is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 525 litres | 440 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1106 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Impala has more luggage capacity. Chevrolet Impala has 85 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S80. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`140 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Impala has
|
Volvo S80 has
| |