Chevrolet Impala 2000 vs Toyota Camry 2001
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.4 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 186 HP | |
| Torque: | 278 NM | 273 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 9.1 seconds | |
|
Toyota Camry is a more dynamic driving. Chevrolet Impala engine produces 9 HP less power than Toyota Camry, but torque is 5 NM more than Toyota Camry. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Impala reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 | 11.0 | |
|
The Chevrolet Impala is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Impala consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Camry, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Impala over 15,000 km in a year you can save 270 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| Chevrolet Impala gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Chevrolet Impala is larger, but slightly lower. Chevrolet Impala is 26 cm longer than the Toyota Camry, 6 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Impala is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 525 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Impala has
|
Toyota Camry has
| |