Chevrolet Impala 2000 vs SAAB 9-5 2001
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.4 Petrol | 2.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 250 HP | |
| Torque: | 278 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 8.2 seconds | |
|
SAAB 9-5 is a more dynamic driving. Chevrolet Impala engine produces 73 HP less power than SAAB 9-5, whereas torque is 72 NM less than SAAB 9-5. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Impala reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 | 9.8 | |
|
The Chevrolet Impala is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Impala consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9-5, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Impala over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 4.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Chevrolet Impala is larger, but slightly lower. Chevrolet Impala is 25 cm longer than the SAAB 9-5, 7 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Impala is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 525 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Impala has
|
SAAB 9-5 has
| |