Chevrolet Impala 2000 vs Opel Omega 1999
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.4 Petrol | 2.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 144 HP | |
| Torque: | 278 NM | 203 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Impala is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Impala engine produces 33 HP more power than Opel Omega, whereas torque is 75 NM more than Opel Omega. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Impala reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 | 9.6 | |
| Chevrolet Impala consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Omega, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Impala over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| Opel Omega gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Chevrolet Impala) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Opel Omega) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 4.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Chevrolet Impala is larger. Chevrolet Impala is 18 cm longer than the Opel Omega, 8 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 525 litres | 530 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 830 litres | |
| Chevrolet Impala has 5 litres less trunk space than the Opel Omega. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`080 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Impala has
|
Opel Omega has
| |