Chevrolet Impala 2000 vs Ford Mondeo 2000
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.4 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 177 HP | 145 HP | |
Torque: | 278 NM | 190 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
Chevrolet Impala engine produces 32 HP more power than Ford Mondeo, whereas torque is 88 NM more than Ford Mondeo. Despite the higher power, Chevrolet Impala reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 | 8.0 | |
The Ford Mondeo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Impala consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Impala could require 180 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 59 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
950 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.08 m | 4.73 m | |
Width: | 1.86 m | 1.81 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.43 m | |
Chevrolet Impala is larger. Chevrolet Impala is 35 cm longer than the Ford Mondeo, 5 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Impala is 3 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 525 litres | 500 litres | |
Chevrolet Impala has more luggage capacity. Chevrolet Impala has 25 litres more trunk space than the Ford Mondeo. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 11.1 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`865 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | average | |
Average price (€): | 800 | 1200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Impala has
|
Ford Mondeo has
| |