Chevrolet Impala 2000 vs Audi A6 2001
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.4 Petrol | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 177 HP | 180 HP | |
Torque: | 278 NM | 370 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
Audi A6 is a more dynamic driving. Chevrolet Impala engine produces 3 HP less power than Audi A6, whereas torque is 92 NM less than Audi A6. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Impala reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 | 8.1 | |
The Audi A6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Impala consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Impala could require 165 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 70 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
950 km on highway | 1120 km on highway | ||
Audi A6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.08 m | 4.80 m | |
Width: | 1.86 m | 1.81 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.45 m | |
Chevrolet Impala is larger. Chevrolet Impala is 28 cm longer than the Audi A6, 5 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Impala is 1 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 525 litres | 551 litres | |
Audi A6 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Chevrolet Impala has 26 litres less trunk space than the Audi A6. This could mean that the Chevrolet Impala uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 11.7 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`145 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | average | |
Average price (€): | 800 | 1800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Impala has
|
Audi A6 has
| |