Chevrolet Impala 2000 vs Volkswagen Passat 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.4 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 278 NM | 195 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
| Chevrolet Impala engine produces 47 HP more power than Volkswagen Passat, whereas torque is 83 NM more than Volkswagen Passat. Despite the higher power, Chevrolet Impala reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 | 8.0 | |
|
The Volkswagen Passat is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Impala consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Passat, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Impala could require 180 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
| Volkswagen Passat gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Chevrolet Impala is larger. Chevrolet Impala is 38 cm longer than the Volkswagen Passat, 11 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 525 litres | 475 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Impala has more luggage capacity. Chevrolet Impala has 50 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Passat. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight: | no data | 1`930 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Impala has
|
Volkswagen Passat has
| |