Chevrolet Impala 2000 vs Ford Mustang 1999
| Body: | Sedan | Coupe | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 3.4 Petrol | 3.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 193 HP | |
| Torque: | 278 NM | 298 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
|
Ford Mustang is a more dynamic driving. Chevrolet Impala engine produces 16 HP less power than Ford Mustang, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Ford Mustang. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Impala reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 | 12.0 | |
|
The Chevrolet Impala is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Impala consumes 2.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mustang, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Impala over 15,000 km in a year you can save 420 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 480 km in combined cycle | |
| Chevrolet Impala gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Chevrolet Impala) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Ford Mustang) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.35 m | |
| Chevrolet Impala is 42 cm longer than the Ford Mustang, width is practically the same , while the height of Chevrolet Impala is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 525 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 16 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Impala has
|
Ford Mustang has
| |