Chevrolet Impala 2000 vs Chrysler Concorde 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.4 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 237 HP | |
| Torque: | 278 NM | 339 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 8 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Concorde is a more dynamic driving. Chevrolet Impala engine produces 60 HP less power than Chrysler Concorde, whereas torque is 61 NM less than Chrysler Concorde. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Impala reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 | 10.8 | |
|
The Chevrolet Impala is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Impala consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Concorde, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Impala over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 760 km on highway | ||
| Chevrolet Impala gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 5.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Chevrolet Impala is smaller, but slightly higher. Chevrolet Impala is 20 cm shorter than the Chrysler Concorde, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Impala is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 525 litres | 530 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight: | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Impala has
|
Chrysler Concorde has
| |