Chevrolet Impala 2000 vs Chrysler 300M 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.4 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 254 HP | |
| Torque: | 278 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 8.8 seconds | |
|
Chrysler 300M is a more dynamic driving. Chevrolet Impala engine produces 77 HP less power than Chrysler 300M, whereas torque is 62 NM less than Chrysler 300M. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Impala reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 | 10.7 | |
|
The Chevrolet Impala is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Impala consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler 300M, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Impala over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 750 km on highway | ||
| Chevrolet Impala gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 5.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.42 m | |
| Chevrolet Impala is 8 cm longer than the Chrysler 300M, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Impala is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 525 litres | 530 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 530 litres | |
| Chevrolet Impala has 5 litres less trunk space than the Chrysler 300M. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`120 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Impala has
|
Chrysler 300M has
| |