Chevrolet Impala 2000 vs Chevrolet Impala 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.4 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 214 HP | |
| Torque: | 278 NM | 290 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 9 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Impala 2006 is a more dynamic driving. Chevrolet Impala 2000 engine produces 37 HP less power than Chevrolet Impala 2006, whereas torque is 12 NM less than Chevrolet Impala 2006. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Impala 2000 reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 | 9.0 | |
| Chevrolet Impala 2000 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Impala 2006, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Impala 2000 could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 5.09 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.49 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chevrolet Impala 2000 is 1 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Impala 2006, width is practically the same , while the height of Chevrolet Impala 2000 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 525 litres | 527 litres | |
| Chevrolet Impala 2000 has 2 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Impala 2006. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Impala has
|
Chevrolet Impala has
| |