Chevrolet Impala 2006 vs Chrysler 300C 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.3 Petrol | 5.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 307 HP | 340 HP | |
| Torque: | 438 NM | 525 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.5 seconds | 6.4 seconds | |
| Chevrolet Impala engine produces 33 HP less power than Chrysler 300C, whereas torque is 87 NM less than Chrysler 300C. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Impala reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.2 | 12.0 | |
|
The Chevrolet Impala is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Impala consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler 300C, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Impala over 15,000 km in a year you can save 270 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 71 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 780 km on highway | 810 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Chevrolet Impala) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Chrysler 300C) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.09 m | 5.02 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chevrolet Impala is 7 cm longer than the Chrysler 300C, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Impala is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 527 litres | 504 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 504 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Impala has more luggage capacity. Chevrolet Impala has 23 litres more trunk space than the Chrysler 300C. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`280 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Impala has
|
Chrysler 300C has
| |