Chevrolet Impala 2006 vs Mitsubishi Galant 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 3.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 214 HP | 230 HP | |
| Torque: | 290 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Chevrolet Impala engine produces 16 HP less power than Mitsubishi Galant, but torque is 40 NM more than Mitsubishi Galant. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 | 10.3 | |
|
The Chevrolet Impala is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Impala consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Galant, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Impala over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 67 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 770 km on highway | ||
| Chevrolet Impala gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.09 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.49 m | |
|
Chevrolet Impala is larger. Chevrolet Impala is 23 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Galant, 1 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 527 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.1 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`985 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 5200 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Impala has
|
Mitsubishi Galant has
| |