Chevrolet Impala 2006 vs Lexus LS 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 4.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 214 HP | 367 HP | |
| Torque: | 290 NM | 466 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Chevrolet Impala engine produces 153 HP less power than Lexus LS, whereas torque is 176 NM less than Lexus LS. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 | 10.2 | |
|
The Chevrolet Impala is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Impala consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Lexus LS, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Impala over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 84 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| Lexus LS gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.09 m | 5.06 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chevrolet Impala is 3 cm longer than the Lexus LS, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Impala is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 527 litres | 510 litres | |
| Chevrolet Impala has 17 litres more trunk space than the Lexus LS. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`654 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 11 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Impala has
|
Lexus LS has
| |