Chevrolet Impala 2006 vs Jaguar XJ 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 214 HP | 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 290 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 7.5 seconds | |
|
Jaguar XJ is a more dynamic driving. Chevrolet Impala engine produces 26 HP less power than Jaguar XJ, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Jaguar XJ. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Impala reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 | 9.3 | |
| Chevrolet Impala consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar XJ, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Impala over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 82 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
| Jaguar XJ gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Chevrolet Impala) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Jaguar XJ) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.09 m | 5.12 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Chevrolet Impala is smaller, but higher. Chevrolet Impala is 3 cm shorter than the Jaguar XJ, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Impala is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 527 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.3 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`240 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 14 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Impala has
|
Jaguar XJ has
| |