Chevrolet Impala 2013 vs Dodge RAM 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Sedan | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Chevrolet Impala is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Dodge RAM has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Chevrolet Impala is available only with front wheel drive, while Dodge RAM can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.4 - 3.6 | 3.7 - 5.7 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 184 - 309 HP | 212 - 396 HP | |
| Torque: | 233 - 358 NM | 319 - 552 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 - 10.7 | no data | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.11 m | 5.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 2.02 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.92 m | |
|
Chevrolet Impala is smaller. Chevrolet Impala is 70 cm shorter than the Dodge RAM, 16 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Impala is 42 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 532 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 38 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Impala has
|
Dodge RAM has
| |