Chevrolet Impala 2000 vs Toyota 4-Runner 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Sedan | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Chevrolet Impala is available only with front wheel drive, while Toyota 4-Runner can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 3.4 - 3.8 | 4.0 - 4.7 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 - 245 HP | 235 - 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 278 - 380 NM | 382 - 434 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7 - 10 seconds | 7.8 - 8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 - 10.2 | 12.2 - 14.1 | |
|
Chevrolet Impala petrol engines consumes on average 3.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Toyota 4-Runner. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.76 m | |
| Chevrolet Impala is 28 cm longer than the Toyota 4-Runner, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Impala is 30 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 525 litres | 1195 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2050 litres | |
|
Toyota 4-Runner has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Chevrolet Impala has 670 litres less trunk space than the Toyota 4-Runner. This could mean that the Chevrolet Impala uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.1 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 2`411 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Impala has
|
Toyota 4-Runner has
| |