Chevrolet Impala 2000 vs Hyundai Equus 1999
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 3.4 - 3.8 | 3.5 - 4.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 - 245 HP | 210 - 270 HP | |
| Torque: | 278 - 380 NM | 314 - 381 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7 - 10 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 - 10.2 | 12.5 - 13.5 | |
|
Chevrolet Impala petrol engines consumes on average 3.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Hyundai Equus. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 5.07 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chevrolet Impala is 2 cm longer than the Hyundai Equus, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Impala is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 525 litres | 505 litres | |
| Chevrolet Impala has 20 litres more trunk space than the Hyundai Equus. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 2`128 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Impala has
|
| |