Chevrolet Impala 2000 vs Ford Mustang 1999

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Chevrolet Impala
2000 - 2005
Ford Mustang
1999 - 2004
Body: SedanCoupe
Gearbox: Automatic Manual/Automatic
Chevrolet Impala is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Ford Mustang has both automatic and manual transmission options.
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Rear wheel drive (RWD)
Chevrolet Impala is available with front wheel drive, while Ford Mustang can be equipped with rear wheel drive.
Engines: 3.4 - 3.83.8

Performance

Power: 177 - 245 HP193 HP
Torque: 278 - 380 NM298 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7 - 10 seconds9.3 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.2 - 10.212.0
Chevrolet Impala petrol engines consumes on average 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford Mustang.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 5.08 m4.66 m
Width: 1.86 m1.86 m
Height: 1.46 m1.35 m
Chevrolet Impala is 42 cm longer than the Ford Mustang, width is practically the same , while the height of Chevrolet Impala is 11 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 525 litresno data
Turning diameter: no data11.7 meters
Gross weight (kg): no datano data
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 8007600
Pros and Cons: Chevrolet Impala has
  • automatic transmission only
  • lower fuel consumption
  • lower price
Ford Mustang has
  • both manual and automatic
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv