Chevrolet Impala 2000 vs Ford Mustang 1999
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Body: | Sedan | Coupe | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
Chevrolet Impala is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Ford Mustang has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Chevrolet Impala is available with front wheel drive, while Ford Mustang can be equipped with rear wheel drive. | |||
Engines: | 3.4 - 3.8 | 3.8 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 177 - 245 HP | 193 HP | |
Torque: | 278 - 380 NM | 298 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7 - 10 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 - 10.2 | 12.0 | |
Chevrolet Impala petrol engines consumes on average 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford Mustang. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.08 m | 4.66 m | |
Width: | 1.86 m | 1.86 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.35 m | |
Chevrolet Impala is 42 cm longer than the Ford Mustang, width is practically the same , while the height of Chevrolet Impala is 11 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 525 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | no data | 11.7 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 800 | 7600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Impala has
|
Ford Mustang has
| |