Chevrolet Impala 2000 vs Dodge Intrepid 1997
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 3.4 - 3.8 | 2.7 - 3.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 - 245 HP | 163 - 250 HP | |
| Torque: | 278 - 380 NM | 245 - 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7 - 10 seconds | 8.5 - 10.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 - 10.2 | 9.1 - 10.6 | |
|
Chevrolet Impala petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Dodge Intrepid. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 5.16 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Chevrolet Impala is smaller, but slightly higher. Chevrolet Impala is 8 cm shorter than the Dodge Intrepid, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Impala is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 525 litres | 520 litres | |
| Chevrolet Impala has 5 litres more trunk space than the Dodge Intrepid. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 2`070 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Impala has
|
| |