Chevrolet Impala 2000 vs Chrysler Concorde 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 3.4 - 3.8 | 2.7 - 3.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 - 245 HP | 203 - 253 HP | |
| Torque: | 278 - 380 NM | 258 - 339 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7 - 10 seconds | 8 - 10.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 - 10.2 | 10.1 - 10.8 | |
|
Chevrolet Impala petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Chrysler Concorde. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 5.29 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Chevrolet Impala is smaller, but slightly higher. Chevrolet Impala is 21 cm shorter than the Chrysler Concorde, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Impala is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 525 litres | 530 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 530 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight: | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Impala has
|
| |