Chevrolet Impala 2000 vs Chrysler 300M 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 3.4 - 3.8 | 2.7 - 3.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 - 245 HP | 203 - 254 HP | |
| Torque: | 278 - 380 NM | 256 - 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7 - 10 seconds | 8.8 - 10 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 - 10.2 | 10.5 - 10.7 | |
|
Chevrolet Impala petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Chrysler 300M. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 5.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.42 m | |
| Chevrolet Impala is 8 cm longer than the Chrysler 300M, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Impala is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 525 litres | 530 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 530 litres | |
| Chevrolet Impala has 5 litres less trunk space than the Chrysler 300M. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 2`120 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Impala has
|
| |