Chevrolet Impala 2006 vs Mitsubishi Galant 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 3.5 - 5.3 | 2.4 - 3.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 214 - 307 HP | 158 - 258 HP | |
| Torque: | 290 - 438 NM | 213 - 330 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.5 - 9 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 - 10.2 | 9.5 - 10.3 | |
|
Chevrolet Impala petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Galant. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.09 m | 4.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Chevrolet Impala is larger. Chevrolet Impala is 23 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Galant, 1 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 527 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.1 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 1`985 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 5200 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Impala has
|
| |