Chevrolet Impala 2006 vs Ford Fusion 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
---|---|---|---|
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
Chevrolet Impala is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Ford Fusion has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
Engines: | 3.5 - 5.3 (petrol) | 1.2 - 1.6 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 214 - 307 HP | 68 - 100 HP | |
Torque: | 290 - 438 NM | 110 - 204 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.5 - 9 seconds | 10.9 - 15.5 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 - 10.2 | 4.4 - 7.7 | |
Chevrolet Impala petrol engines consumes on average 3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford Fusion. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.09 m | 4.02 m | |
Width: | 1.85 m | 1.72 m | |
Height: | 1.49 m | 1.53 m | |
Chevrolet Impala is larger, but slightly lower. Chevrolet Impala is 107 cm longer than the Ford Fusion, 13 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Impala is 4 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 527 litres | 337 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1175 litres | |
Chevrolet Impala has more luggage capacity. Chevrolet Impala has 190 litres more trunk space than the Ford Fusion. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 10.3 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 1`626 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | high | |
Average price (€): | 5200 | 2800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Impala has
|
Ford Fusion has
| |