Chevrolet Impala 2006 vs Chrysler 200 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 3.5 - 5.3 | 2.4 - 3.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 214 - 307 HP | 173 - 287 HP | |
| Torque: | 290 - 438 NM | 225 - 353 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.5 - 9 seconds | 6.5 - 9.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 - 10.2 | 8.1 - 10.2 | |
|
Chevrolet Impala petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Chrysler 200. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.09 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Chevrolet Impala is larger. Chevrolet Impala is 22 cm longer than the Chrysler 200, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 527 litres | 390 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Impala has more luggage capacity. Chevrolet Impala has 137 litres more trunk space than the Chrysler 200. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 2`115 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5200 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Impala has
|
Chrysler 200 has
| |