Chevrolet Impala 2006 vs Chevrolet Camaro 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Sedan | Coupe | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Chevrolet Impala is available with front wheel drive, while Chevrolet Camaro can be equipped with rear wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 3.5 - 5.3 | 3.6 - 6.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 214 - 307 HP | 312 - 426 HP | |
| Torque: | 290 - 438 NM | 377 - 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.5 - 9 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 - 10.2 | 11.1 | |
|
Chevrolet Impala petrol engines consumes on average 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Camaro. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.09 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.38 m | |
| Chevrolet Impala is 26 cm longer than the Chevrolet Camaro, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Impala is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 527 litres | 320 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Impala has more luggage capacity. Chevrolet Impala has 207 litres more trunk space than the Chevrolet Camaro. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 1`737 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 17 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Impala has
|
| |