Chevrolet Evanda 2005 vs Volvo S80 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.4 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Chevrolet Evanda) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Volvo S80) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 131 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 181 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Volvo S80 is a more dynamic driving. Chevrolet Evanda engine produces 1 HP more power than Volvo S80, but torque is 99 NM less than Volvo S80. Despite the higher power, Chevrolet Evanda reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.6 | 7.8 | |
|
The Volvo S80 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Evanda consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S80, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Evanda could require 270 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
| Volvo S80 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.77 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.43 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chevrolet Evanda is 5 cm shorter than the Volvo S80, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Evanda is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 440 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1106 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Evanda is 0.6 metres less than that of the Volvo S80, which means Chevrolet Evanda can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Evanda has
|
Volvo S80 has
| |