Chevrolet Evanda 2005 vs Rover 75 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 131 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 181 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
|
Rover 75 is a more dynamic driving. Chevrolet Evanda engine produces 15 HP more power than Rover 75, but torque is 79 NM less than Rover 75. Despite the higher power, Chevrolet Evanda reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.6 | 5.8 | |
|
The Rover 75 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Evanda consumes 3.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Rover 75, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Evanda could require 570 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 1120 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 1380 km on highway | ||
| Rover 75 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.77 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.39 m | |
|
Chevrolet Evanda is larger. Chevrolet Evanda is 2 cm longer than the Rover 75, 4 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Evanda is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 432 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 432 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Evanda is 1 metres less than that of the Rover 75, which means Chevrolet Evanda can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 2`030 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Evanda has
|
Rover 75 has
| |